What's Mallard raving about today?
Re Dec. 1: Oh, brother -- he's back to this again? And insinuating collusion on the part of Teh Skery Neegro, to boot? He must have gotten an Urgent Outrage Reminder e-mail from Fox "news".Tell you what, Brucie: You devote a week of strips -- hell, a single strip -- to all the specific ways in which this Obamacare "deception" has negatively impacted your life,* and maybe I'll consider listening to what you have to say on the matter of health care reform.Maybe. *And no, "Poor people and coloreds are able to get health care and keep sucking up my oxygen instead of having the good grace to die in the streets" doesn't count.
Re Dec. 2: You know, I seem to recall another presidential deception, one perpetrated by the previous occupant of the White House... but unlike Obama's "deception", which resulted in millions more Americans having health care, this other deception resulted in an unnecessary and illegal war, which in turn resulted in the deaths of thousands of American soldiers and the deaths of hundreds of thousands of foreign civilians, as well as the torture of prisoners being declared legal because they were labeled "unlawful enemy combatants" instead of "prisoners of war" (which, it occurs to me, qualifies as a deception within a deception), not to mention America's international reputation and moral credibility being shredded.Of course, the president who engaged in that deception was a Republican, and he rationalized it on the basis of Keeping Us Safe™, and our Courageous Truth-Teller never said so much as an unkind word about it... which means we must conclude that said Truth-Teller is only opposed to presidential deceptions under very specific circumstances.
12/6 - Poor Brews, trying to drum up a scandal where there is none. Say, where was this Gruber person the night of ... BENGHAZI?Anyway, as I understand it, Gruber worked on Romney's health plan in Massachusetts before doing similar work with the Affordable Care Act, which makes sense because they're basically the same plan. And at one point during the '12 election Willard was trying to sell the notion that it was perfectly fine idea on the state level, but in federal terms it was wrong, so wrong. Anyway, I'm not sure what Gruber's cynical remark is supposed to prove, but since both policies are working well, I am sure I don't care.
Re Dec. 6: Wow -- he actually stuck with this idiocy for the whole week. Beats working for a living, though, don't it, Bruce?Forget beating a dead horse -- Bruce Tinsley is more like a soldier* who shows up on the battlefield long after the battle is over and everyone else has moved on, and proceeds to heartily thrash away at the corpses of the enemy soldiers while shouting, "I'm winning! I'm winning! I'm winning the battle!! You're terrified of me, aren't you?! HAH! Take that! And that! Fear my mighty wrath, fools!! Aaah-hahahahaha!!!"*Not that Bruce would ever be an actual soldier, of course, because armchair warfare is so much safer.
Yeah, that's Bruce.Anyway, for what I was saying about the Affordable Care Act working, for your copy-and-pasting pleasure:http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2014/12/4-new-studies-obamacare-working-incredibly-well.html
Re Dec. 8: A couple of thoughts:1) Seriously, Bruce? You're launching another week of poutrage over this non-scandal? Congratulations -- you've officially reached a whole new level of pathetic. No one holds a stupid, pointless grudge like a conservative...2) Anyone who thinks NBC, as represented by Chuck Todd (a.k.a. Chuckles the Clown), is a left-wing water-carrier is unaware that Chuckles has been blithely continuing fellow hack David Gregory's grand tradition of using NBC's flagship current events show Meet the Press to dole out wingnut welfare by the bucketful -- not to mention his stated belief (followed by weaselly responsibility-dodging sophistry) that it's not the media's job to call out the GOP when they lie.
Woo - Brews is absolutely positive the Gruber thing proves... something
12/9:I'm guessing that even Fox decided Doctor-Gruber-Doom was a lost cause exactly 3 weeks ago, because now it's Santa and a thing that happened 6 months ago. Somebody really misses when all he needed to do was shriek "BENGHAAAAAZI!" a lot to get his paycheck for being so "timely."
Re Dec. 10: So now Bruce is going back (like, waaaaaaay back, man) to the "identifies as" bugaboo? Looks like we just might be in for a collection of 2014's Greatest Misses.
I'm back and I wanted to clarify, Obama is a very scary black man. That is why when I go to bed I make sure to kiss my Jesus statue with some deep tongue, grab my 3 shotguns and say a prayer to my Bill O'Reily shrine hoping he blesses my life with his eternal wisdom.Back to the Jewish,Kenyan,Racist,Communist,Godless,reptoid Obama; Me and my hooded brothers erm my brothers in the holy cloth withh bounce him out and welcome in a decent Republican President who I personally guarantee will eliminate the poverty and class issues with trickle down economics.America will be safe.
Say, did Comics Kingdom shut off all their comments, or is it just me?
I had to go to the ArcaMax site. The fact that I made some little effort to see today's Mallard means I put more work into it that its creator did.Anyway, Truth To Power Duck sure is sticking it to Big School Fundraiser this week. And after all, if he resents paying one thin dime of taxes to make sure schools don't suck, he's certainly not going to buy some overpriced candy towards that purpose.
Re Dec. 20: Aww, baby cranky? Baby still mad about Obamacare? Baby wanna binky? Well, tough shit, baby. deal with it.And yeah, it looks like Comics Kingdom has discontinued comments on all their strips, at least for now.
12/27 - More people think highly of the prez than think highly of Brews Tinshley. So it's not like people are all that dense, really.
Re Dec. 29: In today's installment, Mallard tries to shore up his Serious Journalist street cred >snicker< by embracing the catechism of Both Siderism (h/t Driftglass).(For those who may be unfamiliar, Both Siderism is the religious doctrine, embraced by pseudo-journalistic hacks everywhere, that every single sociopolitical problem under the sun in America is always equally the fault of The Extremes on Both Sides™, and that the true, correct, and reasonable position is therefore precisely in The Center between those two extremes.)And it's more than a little telling that Mallard/Bruce only engages in concern-trolling about "the facts" when those facts don't reflect well on him and his preconceived prejudices (see also "Zimmerman, George").
Frank Stone: Both-Siderism also has a secondary purpose, perhaps unintentionally. The only time you'll hear any conservative admit culpability, it will include the important words "on both sides" or "everybody does it."
This is a little bit late, but Tinsley seems to be up to his usual trick of implying that it was Obama who had called voters stupid. Actually, it is official GOP policy to rely on the stupidity of voters, to vote against their own interests.
Today, another installment in the classic joke, "I'm Obama! Booga booga booga!!"
Re Jan. 3: Since Mallard is obviously watching Fox "news" channel..."The right-wing terrorist in the following news story ..."...fixed that for you, Bruce.
Garberghazi!!!1!!1! You can huff and puff and flap and quack, Mallard, but that won't make it an actual scandal.
Re Jan. 4: In Mallardworld, not being told what you want to hear is the same thing as a "cover-up". Woooo....
Jan 5: I guess shutting off comments at the syndicate has freed Bruce up to take on FOX News.
"If we do a frat-house gang-rape story without checking it out… …and it turns out not to be true… …we're undermining the credibility of true rape allegations!"Fortunately, this is not at all the case with fraudulent stories of IRS abuses, horrific treason to our troops, and institutional dishonesty. You guys can keep pumping those out forever, and they'll not only be believed over and over, those who believe them will still manage to believe that you're some kind of liberal juggernaut that only says bad things about Democrats when forced by circumstances (an event which happens ten million times per day).
Re Jan. 10: The good news: This is the funniest strip Bruce is likely to produce all year.The bad news: This is the funniest strip Bruce is likely to produce all year.I'd chide Bruce about the importance of saving your best material, but since he long ago established that he doesn't understand comedy, I won't waste my breath.
1/10: "Caving to everything the Democrats want" is Duckspeak for "Okay, we won't bomb Mexico this time, but we're going to bring the motion up at every single session from now until we're all dead."
Find best online jobs ever where you can earn monthly earning without any risk, part time data entry copy pasting and facebook jobs, Join nowRapidIncomeCorner.com
Hot Forex Investments where you can earn profit without any work, just invest on forex and get profit daily upto 12%, Join NowHotFxInvest.com
1/15: Mallard gives concern trolls a pat on the head.
Early January:Here are my New Year predictions:#1. Increased trade dollars, tourism, and information flowing into Cuba will eventually make it more capitalistic and democratic. Give it time. Mallard seems to be against this.#2. The new Congress and Senate will make a big stink. Hold your noses. It has started already:a. Gifts to Wall Streetb. Gifts to oil companiesc. Gifts to pollutersd. Plans to take access to medical care away from very many.What have they done for you?
Jan. 15Where does this stuff about "Haters" come from? Mallard seems to be obsessed about it. Just because he claims that people, belonging to the demographic groups that he hates, use the expression "haters" does not make it true. (That can be said about every MF strip.) The main evidence for "post-rational America" that I see is from MF, as well as his common sources on information
1/16: I rate this strip "mostly true." While the drawing quality is weak, the same is true of many New Yorker cartoons, and the novelty of having the punch line delivered by what has to be a talking penis gives it the sort of 'edge' the current cartoon editor looks for.
1/17: I have to say, this kind of occasional attempt at humor would fare better if the strip had even so much as a single continuing character with human traits that would cause people to identify with them in some small way. (But what do I know? Nobody's giving me wingnut welfare.)
Re Jan. 20: How very curious, Mallard, that you chose to direct your readers to Mahmood's "satirical piece" in The College Fix, rather than the place where it was first published, the Michigan Review (which, while not technically "the school paper", is certainly affiliated with the school).I guess that just fit your Poor Little Victim™ angle better, huh?
1/21:Wow, that Epic Tale of Censorship lasted 2 whole strips. Fox must've dropped it like it was Michelle's Bangs after 2 days as well.
1/22:Aaaaand it's back. How legally actionable and/or racist was Wednesday's strip that they replaced it with filler?
1/23 - My dilemma: On the one hand, I wonder what Brews' latest wingnut martyr actually did, that the Tinsh is so avidly avoiding telling us. On the other hand, I'm not going to go looking through the festering cholera swamps where the information may )or may not) lie. The wingnut mantra, of course, is "do your own research". Because if they honestly and straightforwardly told you, you'd be thoroughly skeeved out.
CW: All you need to know is contained in the two words: "Conservative" "Satire."And on 1/24, Tinsley continues to pound the thesis that rejecting a mean-spirited piece of amateurish crap is exactly the same as censoring Mark Twain, or anybody else the Tea Party would want dead if they were actually alive now.
1/25: Mallard's readers at Arcamax call today's idiotic strip "a perfect example" of how awful those teachers are, and how stupid the kids are. A huffing, cross-eyed, mindless derision strip is considered "an example." So there's your proof that our school system's in trouble. It produced those readers.
Doesn't Brews have a couple of kids? Does he home-school them (yikes)? He seems to have very little understanding of what actually goes on in school. I mean, I get (attempted) satire, but isn't satire supposed to have some connected to the reality people might recognize?
1/28: Bruce and his Tea Party flame are not mature enough for the concept of personal responsibility. Accepting blame for things they've done, are doing, or have announced the intention of doing is so alien to all of them that to their ears, it sounds just like being blamed for things they didn't do.They can't tell the difference. All that "responsibility" talk is gibberish to them anyway. When it follows a particular formula, they can parrot it. That's about it.
1/28:Je Suis Douchey.
Online Jobs is easy now for you, just spend few hours on internet and get unlimited income with Data entry copy pasting facebook and clicking jobsJobzCorner.com
Re Jan. 28: At last, Mallard/Bruce reveals the true victims of the Charlie Hebdo massacre: American conservatives. But then, they're always the true victims, aren't they?
1/29: Mallard wants all you Muslims here to know that since the best treatment you get here is better than the worst treatment you might get in the worst hellhole in the world, you've got it great! Stop complaining and accept your ongoing harassment as part of a decades-long initiation, after which you'll become social conservatives and do your best to pull up the ladder for anyone who came here later than you did. It's the American Way.
Re Jan. 29: Ahhh, I see what you did there, Mallard -- instead of a blanket denial that there's been any kind of anti-Muslim backlash in America, you've now changed the terms of the debate by saying that there's been no "MASS" anti-Muslim backlash. Way to move the goalposts while the ball was in the air, ducky. I hope you didn't tear your rotator cuff patting yourself on the back for that terribly clever little rhetorical trick.
1/30: The duck who either spends the whole strip staring at a tube or staring at us — the duck who harps on the same tired sawdust day in and day out — wants us to know he's bored with three- and four-syllable words.
2/1:Do we count this as Week 2 or Month 2 of "The Terrible Censorship Bruce Won't Explain"?He sure cares a lot about censorship for a guy who always shits his pants when anything Al Sharpton says is reported on at all!
2/5: Too quiet.
2/7 - Mallard has gotten so incoherent it's hard to find anything to respond to. Today's alleged effort is another haphazard collection of buzzwords and elements of talking points - "activists, amirite?" I'd wonder if Brews is emulating his idol Mooselini, except it seems half-hearted even by that measure. And THAT is lazy.
2/11 - And the horrific story about the Muslim family in North Carolina who were shot to death, and evidently targeted because they were Muslim: I'm guessing Captain "All them Mooslims r EEEEEEEEEEEEEVIL!!!!1!!!1!" will have as much to say about that in three weeks as he's had today.Anyway, Mallentines suck WAY worse than regular Mallard, which already sucks plenty.
There's no banal or misophilic sentiment that can't be made worse with awkward, clumsy, arhythmic irregular lines with sort-of rhymes at the ends.
2/17:Wow, Bruce, Michael Moore is Fat and says "America Stinks!" Did your Clinton Blow Job jokes finally go past their sell-by date? This is just as timely as a couple of weeks ago, when you made 2 jokes about Romney running for president after he dropped out. Way to think inside the box and stay behind the curve, Tinny.The Ultimate Ranking of American Presidents: "36. Mallard Fillmore (1850-1853) - America's second duck president (after Andrew Quackson) and first horrible comic strip president. Mostly rolled his eyes at the unbelievable things those whigs were doing at the time."
2/17: "I haven't seen them, but I understand Michael Moore states in all his movies that America sucks!" Thus do the liars lead the ignorant.
Re Feb. 17: Once again, Mallard/Bruce reaches deeeeep into his off-brand kitchen trash bag of moldy oldies to bring us yet another of his Greatest Misses from Yesteryear.But hey, it'll get nods and chuckles from the gullible rubes who make up Bruce's fan base, so I suppose that means he's "earned" his wingnut welfare check for the week.
It is quite apparent that Mallard hates America.
When Bush says we aren't perfect, it's just wholesome, folksy modesty. If Obama says it, it's an attack on America. Because it's impossible for these people to see him as an American.
3/3:Bruce, you sure have a low tolerance for lazy people watching porn while getting paid! For a guy who has Fox News playing 90 hours a week and then spends 5 minutes rubbing out a crappy comic strip to it.Also: good (hand) job researching this by parroting your employer's "newspaper." TRUTH TO POWER whoops, don't use that to mop it up, that's your paycheck. And great, this is going to go on all week.
Re Mar. 7: Wow -- so Bruce devoted an entire week to a non-story he already beat to death months ago. I wish I could say I'm surprised.Tell the truth, Bruce: If you were offered taxpayer money to watch porn, you'd take that deal in a heartbeat -- and rationalize it as "research".
Those people who want Hillary Clinton elected president, so that we could have our first woman president, seem to have learned absolutely nothing from the current disaster of choosing a president on the basis of demographics and symbolism. -- Thomas Sowell
Given that an idiot like Thomas Sowell owes his gig as a wingnut talking head to his being a self-hating African-American, for him to be squawking about demographics and symbolism is pretty rich.But I have to ask what disaster he thinks he's talking about. The economic free fall of the end of the Shrub era has been reversed. Millions have access to health care who didn't have it before. Osama bin Laden sleeps with the fishes after someone let him run around loose for eight years. As for who will succeed president Obama, what alternative to Hillary Clinton are the Reeps preparing to offer, yet another Bush? What sort of demographics and symbolism are involved there?Of course, Anonyboldfont, I see you don't have any actual defense of Mallard Fillmore, the ostensible subject of this space. I will go ahead and invite you to fuck off, however.
For some reason, when I see Sowell's face on a column, I'm reminded of the steer that used to advertise for a steak place in my home town.
March 22: MF himself saying "So you take no responsibility for your own ignorance?"' 'for not consuming any "hard news". The LOL irony makes it one of the (unintentional) funniest MF.
Ha ha, low-info voters. How the disinfo voters laugh at them, never suspecting.
When the Clintons or Obama are involved in something, you can make book on the fact that somebody in the equation's not telling the truth.
...that somebody invariably representing the wingnut propaganda mill of which Mallard is an extraordinarily tiny cog.
Good one today…APRIL FOOL! He's just flogging the long-disproved IRS shit again. You should have seen your face. It was funnier than the strip, anyway.
What has become clear in recent years is that the restoration of Habeas Corpus is a necessity if the American Constitution is to be fully enacted.That and getting all the damn kids off my lawn. I've been firing my M16 at em and now they're just lying around. Bunch of slackers.
Re Apr. 10: Wrong as always, Mallard. What you've defined here is not a "progressive", but a "pseudo-feminist".However, I've got another definition for you which is all too accurate:conservative/kuhn'SUR'vuh'tiv/One who believes that the world was better off when all women were property and had no rights under the law, and who wishes to return the world to that state of affairs.
Very good...Duck and Cover is finally dead!
AnonyBruce, that's because your strip has become pathetic and boring beyond even your abysmal welfare queen standards.
Yes, I'm afraid it's true, Bruce: "Mallard Fillmore" long ago passed the point of no return. It is, for all intents and purposes, a dead strip. It is doomed to a future of being nothing but a series of ever-fainter echoes of itself. And not only does this mean that any further critical commentary has become pointless, but it means that the strip's continued existence has likewise become pointless. Why keep infusing temporary breath into an empty shell, knowing that doing so produces not new vitality, but a mockery of life? Putting "Mallard Fillmore" out of its misery has become the most humane option going forward. I know it's painful, but it needs to be done. And once you've been relieved of the mind-numbing drudgery of recycling Fox "News" talking points, you'll be free to pursue an honest line of work, like grave-digging.With that in mind, I've taken the liberty of writing the script for the final installment of "Mallard Fillmore". The scenario is something of a cliché, I know, but it was the only thing I could think of that would allow the strip as a whole to make anything resembling sense and to shuffle off this mortal coil with something like dignity.It's here for you, buddy. Whenever you're ready.* * * * * * * * * *"Mallard Fillmore" - script for final stripPANEL ONEExtreme closeup on MALLARD FILLMORE's face. His asymmetrical, zombie-like eyes are open and staring blankly, as usual. The angle suggests he's reclining against a pillow.SOUND EFFECT: eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee >klik<VOICE #1 (off panel): Nothing more we can do. OK, call it.PANEL TWOSame as panel one, except that a female HAND is gently closing Mallard's eyelids.VOICE #2 (off panel): Time of death: 9:11 p.m.PANEL THREEWiden to reveal that we are in a HOSPITAL ROOM. We now see that the just-deceased Mallard is lying in bed, and that the voices belong to a DOCTOR who is shutting down a life-support machine next to the bed and a female NURSE who is pulling a sheet over Mallard's face. A wall-mounted TELEVISION SET faces the bed, tuned to FOX NEWS.DOCTOR: Hard to believe the poor guy hung on for more than 20 years after slipping into an alcoholic coma. NURSE: You suppose anything went on in his head during all that time?- fin -
Perhaps there will always be a place to remind us of whatever nonsense the GOK was barking about three weeks ago, before it was roundly debunked and shown to be fiction. Unless we've found richer sources of topical humor, like My Weekly Reader, of course.
One of my local papers still inflicts duck shit on us, but I've long since concluded, from the lack of objections, that either the good people of Hagerstown, MD, don't notice Mallard or they actively want to be blatantly and hideously lied to. Or maybe they've just accepted, as I have, that changing the minds of people who get their information from Fox so-called News, Mallard Fillmore, Rush Limbaugh, the Republican Party and other right-wing media outlets is like trying to tell a Scientologist that some of his "big wins" are either non-existent or semantically null.
Hey guys I am Smart down to earth really easy to get along with in Mumbai.VIP GENTS
Haw haw, the 'moderate' Republican thinks the Tea Party and Trump will make them look silly! Come one! Since when has 'hard-core nativist bigot' equated with 'ha ha look at the big sillies'?
Mallard has lost twelve pounds this year on the "everybody's stupid" diet. Would this were true. Mallards weigh under four pounds.
Don't worry, Tinsley. I'll "never forget" how Bush's screw-up left us with the worst terrorist attack we've ever suffered. That's on your boy.
Mallard was finally dropped from the daily comics last week, in the Hampton-Newport New "Daily Press," now Sunday only. Replaced by Pickles and Beatle Bailey, by reader's vote. In a region that seems predominately wrong-wingers.
This site is finally dead as it should be. Way too many crazed liberals hang out here.
Well done anony. A victory for your side, because Davey ran out of steam and the repetitive nature of Bruce Tinsley's hilarious daily comic made the snark redundant.Now bask in the glory of making fun of Hilary's ass, since the crazed liberals who think that to be silly have run away now that this blog has been discontinued.
Shame. I liked this site, Perhaps I should revive it in spirit, given enough people wanting such a thing.
Post a Comment