Project Wonderful Banner

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

That damned Campaign

What's Mallard raving about today?

President Obama

Two days in and Mallard has tips his hand. See, he's going to contend that President Obama is only good at campaigning and, see, that's why he was re-elected in 2012.

It's going to be a very long 2 years for those of use who subject ourselves to Mallard Fillmore.


Tog said...

And just look at the Republican front-runners! All of the shiny new kids on the block have backed off, and the GOP is, honest to God, thinking about Newt Gingrich.

I'd laugh out loud, but then again I never thought a gibbering moron/vicious asshole combo like the Bush/Cheney ticket had a snowball's chance of getting into office.

DiR said...

"The Budget for dummies"? Really?
Hey, here's one, "Political Cartooning for Dummies"

So what's your point, champ? The budget the republicans fucked up, the foreign policy that republicans fucked up, or governing, which republicans have capitulated to far right gibbering zealots, for the sake of winning campaigns?

Why, here's another one, "Projecting for Dummies".

dlauthor said...

Hey! Maybe Walter Williams will run against him! Let's all clap our hands really fast until the bartender comes back.

Anonymous said...

Oh, I get it! GWB left ALL of his reading material behind in the oval office. Now that's funny. The one Bush did not have, but needed, was "English Grammar for Dummies."

Steve-O said...

Too bad Bush didn't have "Ground Wars in Asia for Dummies".

rewinn said...

During Obama's first 3 years, more Middle Easterners were freed from tyranny than through all 8 of Bush's years.

And no Americans had to die for it.

Mallard's rage over that is understandable: he's neither a naturally-born nor naturalized American citizen.

Frank Stone said...

Even if this cartoon had any basis in truth, that would still be more research than Tinsley has done on anything in his entire life (well, research that didn't include sprawling in front of the tube for hours on end while swilling booze).

Steve-O said...

Since Tinsley is basically calling the president a dummy, how many of you would pay good money to see a debate between Tinsley and President Obama? I'm fairly certain that Drunkard would get his ass handed to him.

Neo Tuxedo said...

how many of you would pay good money to see a debate between Tinsley and President Obama?

Not it, Steve. I'm picturing Tinz' debating persona as basically Bill O'Reilly, only not as classy or as patient.

Tog said...

No offense, but I wouldn't be willing to throw money at giving Tinsley an opportunity to act like a teabagger (screaming down everyone) then play First Amendment Martyr (upon being told to let other people have their say), then yarp up all over someone who, frankly, has more important things to take care of.

Moot point, really. Tinsley would never take up the offer; he'd cower under his desk shrieking hysterically about how he's number one on every lefty's enemies list.

...And we get that for free.

I just thumbed through Federal Budgets For Complete F#&@ing Idiots, and there was a chapter about the Laffer Curve. Go figure!

Kip W said...

Actually, the GOP leadership reads a different kind of book: "Dummies for Union-Busting," "Dummies for CEO Pensions," "Dummies for Fox News," and so on.