What's Mallard raving about today?
Anna Nicole Smith's baby, vehement tax-cut advocates, News organizations.
While I have to admit common cause with Mallard when it comes to coverage of Ms. Smith, I'd like to point out that the "facts" over the last 2 days have only been tangentially-related to taxes at best.
5 comments:
Mallard's Tax Facts...
I love how it's a fact because Bruce Tinsley thinks something to be true regarding opinions and what he thinks other people think is true.
But if it's something he disagrees with, like... GW... then it can't be a fact because part of it's momentum is based on how many other people think it's true.
I think I used think one too many time.
Anyways. Bottom line.
Mallard = Hypocrite.
Mallard a hypocrite? No, he speaks for most americans, not those cwazy liberals. (eyeroll)
He never talks about Bush anymore, if he ever did. Do I have to look at the Jewish World Review's archives when I'm hungry and want to read the paper.
Yeah, I agree. Coverage of ANS and her baby is tiresome.
That's why I don't watch any news but fake news, courtesy of Jon Stewart.
He said "You" are the father of ANS's baby. You were time's person of the year, your year's going great.
I can't believe I find nothing objectional except for him labeling it 'facts' today.
Is there too much new coverage of Anna Nicole Smith's baby? Yes.
Does that excuse Tinsley devoting an entirely humorless strip to that subject? No.
Truce - True.
Nothing excuse Mallard's existance except ideological affirmative action.
Post a Comment