Project Wonderful Banner

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Not a damned Photo

What's Mallard raving about today?

Hillary Clinton.

I refuse to comment because this is a caricature of Hillary Clinton and not a photo.

12 comments:

dlauthor said...

How is that a caricature of Hillary? Looks more like Jack Nicholson in a pantsuit to me.

factinista said...

Maybe that means it's some kind of bizarre commentary on Jack Nicholson's endorsement of Hillary.

Matt Ramone said...

Billy, I just want to make sure you saw this. I wasn't trying to insult you last post. You're my favorite poster on this blog and one of my favorite posters on the blogs I read. I wasn't trying to slag you off.

One of the things I like about this blog (other than Tinzanonymous) is that there is a respectful discussion instead of red-faced polemicism. Wish we coudl take it to a national level.

Michael said...

dlauthor: No, I'm pretty sure that's Louis XIV.

BillyWitchDoctor said...

Matt: No harm, no foul. In any group, there's bound to be disagreement, even fighting, and everyone has the right to be an idiot once in a while. (Even anonymgeox.)

Here, a grown-up weighs in on the Bosnia "revisionist history" flap.

What was Tinsley doing seventeen years ago that was of any significance? Oh, right...very silly question.

Hey Tinny: Still waiting on the "Hillary Smirk" you got your widdle pee-pee in a knot over.

GeoX said...

Say what you want, pardner (and I agree that animosity is kinda silly), but there's no call to imply that I'm usin' sock puppets. Never have; never intend to.

rewinn said...

Kumbayah!

BTW isn't the text accompanying today's non-photo of Hillary a not-so-subtle reference to Bill Clinton's having had sex with a consenting adult to whom he was not married?

I never ceased to be amused by the concept that a woman can be attacked for the rest of her life because her husband cheated on her, but a man like McCain can cheat on his first wife and his backers never blink.

Cuz, you know, he's a man. Or a Republican. Or something.

exanonymous said...

Mallard, it depends on what your definition of "chronic" is.

Look it up. 1, 2, or even 3 incidents isn't chronic.

To some degree, ALL politicians are chronic liars. But then, Tinsley, so are you because you habitually put words that were never spoken into the mouths of others.

Should I suspend disbelief and believe that the chronic liar is telling the truth about another being a chronic liar?

rewinn said...

exanonymous writes: ... even 3 incidents isn't chronic

Ah! but you're using the English meaning.

You need to get a GOP Dictionary. It's a different language entirely, in which the meanings of words is completely dependent upon whether they are applied to a Republican or not.

Anonymous said...

See, this is why Mallard is awesome. Doonesbury somehow managed to miss the opportunity to have GWB say "Read my lips, no more casualties" in every war strip. Somebody needs to raise their game.

TuxedoSlack said...

I predict, based on his past performance, that in tomorrow's strip, the Fucked Duck will once again claim that people who object to his drawing of Hillary want her to receive "special treatment", as if being consistently drawn to resemble the result of the Joker doing sex with Grendel's mother weren't special treatment. (In other words, I predict that Tinz will be talking out of his hiptbmia, which is unsurprising since it's going to be a day ending in Y.)

BillyWitchDoctor said...

drawn to resemble the result of the Joker doing sex with Grendel's mother

which is unsurprising since it's going to be a day ending in Y


Damn your rotten hide--this was a brand new monitor!! (winking emoticon)(laughing emoticon)